TESTIMONIES

The finest testimony of the year was told on a Sunday evening. Nobody wrote it down.

Somewhere to post it, without giving a name - the field does not exist in the database. And nothing appears before a leader has read it. What is said in a congregation deserves both.

Try it with my churchRead the documentation
Postedby a member, from their phone

I lost my job in March. The congregation prayed, and brothers helped me hold on for three months without my asking for anything. I signed elsewhere in June.

No authorthe field does not exist in the database, there is nothing to hide
The text never changes. What changes around it is who can see it.
After the service

That is where people tell what happened. And that is where it is lost, for want of somewhere to write it.

No name

Anonymity is not a checkbox. It is the absence of the field.

An option you can tick is an option you can untick, forget, or change your mind about six months later. Here there is nothing to untick: the testimony has no author in the database, and nobody can give it one.

Nothing to hide, because nothing is stored
This is not a name hidden at display time: the data does not exist. No leader, no administrator, no query will find it.
That is what makes people dare
A debt, an addiction, a hard reconciliation. Those stories are only told if you are certain they carry no signature.
The date stays
A testimony without a date floats. With one, it takes its place in the story of the congregation - and that story encourages the next one.
Try it with my church
The review

A testimony can name someone else. That is why nothing appears directly.

The writer is thinking of their own story, not of the spouse they quote, the doctor they name, or the family everyone will recognise. Review is not censorship: it is the least care owed to people who asked for nothing.

A queue, and a leader
Posts arrive in a queue. A leader reads them, publishes or sets them aside. Until someone has read, nobody sees.
Setting aside is not judging
A testimony can be set aside over one sentence to reword or a third party to protect, not because it is worthless.
The same gesture for all
Publish and set aside are two buttons side by side, and nothing else. A complicated moderation tool ends up unused.
Where they live

On the church page, where someone from the neighbourhood can come across it.

A testimony filed in a binder encourages nobody. Published on the congregation's public page, it becomes what it always was: a reason to hope, offered to whoever passes by.

The church's public page
Approved testimonies appear on the page the church shares, the one a search engine indexes.
Nothing automatic
No sharing to social networks, no republishing elsewhere unless you decide it. What is published is published there, and nowhere else.
Removable
A published testimony can be taken down. People change, situations move on, and what was right two years ago may not be any more.

What Testimonies does, and what it does not

A product page that only says good things is a page nobody believes. Here is the exact limit.

What it does
  • Posting without a name, guaranteed by the absence of the field in the database.
  • A review queue, with publish or set aside.
  • Publication on the church's public page, with the date.
  • Removal of an already published testimony.
What it does not do
  • This is not a reviews module. Nothing is rated, nothing is ranked, there are no stars and no like counter.
  • Anonymity covers the author FIELD. A testimony detailed enough can still make its author recognisable in a small congregation - which is exactly what the review must watch for.
  • There is no public reply. A testimony does not open a discussion: what needs answering is answered face to face.

The next one will be written down.

Open the form, review, publish. What the congregation lived stops being lost between two Sundays.

Try it with my churchSee pricing